Nevada County QWSG · Permitting & Environmental Compliance Subcommittee
Reference · current through June 2026

CEQA decision pathways for forest health & fuels reduction projects.

A working map of the streamlined exemptions, programmatic tiers, and standard CEQA documents available to California forest projects — updated for SB 131 (2025), the March 2025 Emergency Proclamation framework, and the June 2026 draft state Wildfire and Landscape Resilience Action Plan.

Master tree
5 decision points
Exemption menu
8 pathways
Status
Current as of June 2026
Prepared by
Permitting & Env. Compliance Subcommittee, Nevada County QWSG

What changed recently

Nine updates that reshape the menu
Closed · May 1, 2026
March 2025 Emergency Proclamation window has closed
Suspension of CEQA, CESA, and Coastal Act for projects ≤3,000 ac. Application window closed; over 400 projects (~80,000 ac) were approved. On-the-ground work for approved projects must begin by Oct 15, 2026. Maintenance treatments need a separate CEQA pathway afterward.
EO N-38-25
Sunsets · Jan 1, 2028
Federal-NEPA exemption is set to expire Jan 1, 2028
PRC §4799.05(d) — created by SB 901 (2018), with the sunset extended to Jan 1, 2028 by AB 211 (2022) — exempts NEPA-reviewed federal-land prescribed fire, reforestation, habitat restoration, thinning, and fuel reduction projects. A 2025 bill to remove the sunset (AB 404, Sanchez) failed in committee (Feb 2026), so the exemption is currently scheduled to expire absent further legislation.
SB 901 (2018) · AB 211 (2022)
New · Eff. June 30, 2025
SB 131 adds a permanent wildfire exemption
PRC §21080.49 — four categories: small prescribed fire, evacuation-route clearance, home hardening / defensible space, and 200‑ft fuel breaks. As a statutory exemption, the §15300.2 exceptions do not apply.
SB 131 (2025)
Extended · Jan 1, 2030
SB 174 extended SERP
The Statutory Exemption for Restoration Projects (PRC §21080.56) was extended from its original 2025 sunset to Jan 1, 2030. No acreage cap; requires CDFW Director concurrence.
SB 174 (2024)
Updated · 2024
AB 2276 reshaped Forest Practice exemptions
Repealed the Small Timberland Owner Exemption. Renamed Forest Fire Prevention as the Forest Resilience Exemption and extended it to Jan 1, 2031. Revised the Oak Woodland Exemption (14 CCR §1038(e)) to allow larger conifer removal (Board of Forestry rulemaking in progress).
AB 2276 (Wood, 2024)
Status check · 2025–26 session
Fuels-reduction CEQA exemption bills to watch
AB 1227 (Ellis) — would exempt critical fuels reduction in Very High FHSZ communities through Jan 1, 2028, with a noticed public meeting; passed the Assembly but was held under submission in Senate Appropriations (Aug 2025), surviving only as a two-year bill. SB 375 (Grove) — would have exempted fuel reduction across FHSZ tiers (with ESA & Coastal Act components) but failed (returned to the Secretary of the Senate under Joint Rule 56, Feb 2026). AB 2102 (DeMaio) — would exempt private-property fuel-reduction activities regardless of acreage; referred to Assembly committees March 2026 but has not advanced. AB 1227 is the only one still arguably live; none is law. (Note: the former AB 442 evacuation-route concept is gone — AB 442 was gut-amended in 2026 into a Forest Practice Act bill on NTMP/WFMP acreage caps.)
2025–26 session
In progress · 2026
CNRA institutionalizing Cutting Green Tape
February 2026 Secretarial Memo directs Natural Resources Agency departments to embed CGT permitting and CEQA-streamlining improvements as standard practice. Implementation progress report due Sept 1, 2026. Watch for expanded use of SERP, RMP, and SRGO programmatic pathways.
CNRA Secretarial Memo (Feb 2026)
Proposed · June 2026 draft Action Plan
A durable replacement for the emergency streamlining process
The Task Force's draft 2026–2031 Action Plan (Key Action 3.7) directs CNRA, CalEPA, and the Board of Forestry to explore a durable framework for streamlined approval of fuel reduction, beneficial fire, and other resilience projects — modeled on the March 2025 emergency process that expired May 1, 2026, and noted as likely to require new legislation. The plan also backs expanded federal streamlining (3.9): categorical exclusions, programmatic NEPA, and time-bounded reviews. Proposed, not yet law. The draft was released June 5, 2026; the partner-review period closes Aug 7, 2026, with a final plan expected fall 2026.
Draft Action Plan (June 2026)
In progress · 2026
CalVTP PEIR update underway
AB 52 tribal consultations opened June 22, 2025; type-conversion analysis is being added per the May 30, 2025 Court of Appeal decision. The current PEIR remains in effect for new PSAs in the meantime — except for chaparral and coastal sage scrub treatments, which the Court directed may not proceed during the Update except for a narrow set of critical safety projects. The June 2026 draft Action Plan (Key Action 3.6) proposes the update may also extend CalVTP to the Local Responsibility Area, expand automatic permit enrollments, reach the coastal zone, enable combined CDFW approvals, cover projects with biomass cost-recovery, and add non-forested / shrubland provisions.
Board of Forestry
§ 01 · Master decision tree

Walk the decision tree.

Answer the questions in order. Each click narrows the path; the recommended pathway appears on the right. The tree captures the master flow only — see the exemption menu below for the full detail on each statutory and categorical option.

The four pathway types — color-coded throughout this reference
Streamlined pathway
A statutory or categorical exemption from CEQA. File a Notice of Exemption — no Initial Study, no EIR. Statutory exemptions (§4799.05(d), SB 131, SERP) are the strongest because the §15300.2 exceptions don’t apply.
Programmatic pathway
Tier from an existing Program EIR — most commonly the CalVTP PEIR (prepare a Project-Specific Analysis), or coordinate with the local CAL FIRE Unit on an active Vegetation Management Program (VMP) project. Or proceed under a Forest Practice document (THP / NTMP / PTEIR / FPR exemption) that serves as a CEQA functional equivalent. Some regions also have local or agency PEIRs (fire district or park district vegetation management plans) that can be tiered from within their jurisdiction.
Standard CEQA document
Full project-specific review: Initial Study → Negative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or Environmental Impact Report. Lead agency files a Notice of Determination.
Expired / closed pathway
No longer available for new applications. Shown for context — e.g. the March 2025 Emergency Proclamation, whose application window closed May 1, 2026 (approved projects remain valid).
§ 02 · Exemption menu

Which exemption fits your project?

Expanded detail for the “statutory or categorical exemption” branch of the master tree. Apply the most protective / durable exemption first. Statutory exemptions (①②③) are stronger than categorical — they are not subject to the §15300.2 exceptions.

If your project involves a commercial timber or biomass sale on private or state land, start with ⑧ (Forest Practice Act) — THP/NTMP/PTEIR review is the functional CEQA equivalent and governs before any of the exemptions below apply.

Statutory · sunset Jan 1, 2028

NEPA-reviewed federal projects SB 901 / AB 211 · PRC §4799.05(d)

The cleanest pathway for BLM / USFS partner work.

Eligible activities. Prescribed fire, reforestation, habitat restoration, thinning, fuel reduction, and related activities.

Eligible lands. Federal lands (in whole or in part).

Trigger. NEPA review complete (ROD, FONSI, CatEx). Significant impacts identified in a NEPA EIS must be avoided or mitigated.

Funding. State grants on federal land, including Good Neighbor Authority projects.

Example use: BLM / USFS projects with completed NEPA review PRC §4799.05 statute text
Statutory · no sunset

Wildfire risk reduction SB 131 · PRC §21080.49

New in 2025. Project must fit one of four categories cleanly.
(a)
Prescribed fire / fuel reduction to restore fire return interval: ≤50 contiguous acres, within ½ mile of a subdivision of ≥30 dwelling units. Excludes coastal sage scrub & other sensitive habitat. CDFW consultation required.
(b)
Defensible space fire clearance on public roadways that are egress or evacuation routes serving communities of ≥30 residences. Clearance limited to 100 ft from the roadway. Flammable vegetation and trees <12″ DBH only. No acreage cap — constrained by the corridor width.
(c)
Home hardening / defensible space within 200 ft of a legal structure in a High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ). Covers structural hardening and immediate defensible space activities. No tree-size limit specified. Requires FHSZ location.
(d)
Fuel break within 200 ft of structures, clearing flammable vegetation and trees <12″ DBH. Unlike (c), no FHSZ requirement — applies wherever structures are present. Use this category for fuel-break work outside a designated severity zone, or where tree-size constraints fit the project.

§15300.2 exceptions do not apply. Project must comply with all other laws, ordinances, zoning.

Statutory · sunset Jan 1, 2030

SERP — Habitat restoration “Cutting the Green Tape” · PRC §21080.56

No acreage cap. No location-based exceptions.

Eligible activities. Projects to conserve, restore, protect, or enhance California native fish, wildlife, and their habitat — or to restore or provide such habitat.

“Exclusively” requirement. Project must be exclusively restoration. Incidental public benefits (access, recreation) allowed; construction must be solely habitat-related.

Process. Lead agency findings (subdivisions a–d) → CDFW Director concurrence → file NOE with OPR within 48 hours. CDFW target: 60 days.

Recent precedent: SNC CHIRP fuels-reduction grant amendment, Oct 2025 CDFW SERP program
Categorical · §15300.2 applies

Class 4 — Minor Alterations to Land CEQA Guidelines §15304

The workhorse for small fuels & forestry projects — but §15300.2 exceptions apply.

Scope. Minor alterations to land, water, and vegetation — thinning, ladder-fuel removal, roadside brushing, fuel break maintenance. Removal of healthy mature scenic trees is barred unless for forestry or agricultural purposes, in which case RPF attestation citing PRC §753 is the standard basis.

Any §15300.2 exception defeats the exemption — address each in the NOE:

Sensitive location. Mapped critical habitat, rare plant communities, riparian zones, or scenic corridors disqualify regardless of project size. Check CNDDB before filing.

Unusual circumstances. T&E species, steep-slope erosion from heavy equipment, or other site conditions creating a reasonable possibility of significant effect — document routine conditions and any CDFW consultation.

Cumulative impact. Individually minor treatments may fail collectively when one of several planned phases on the same landscape.

Scenic, historical, hazardous. Damage to state-designated scenic-highway views, listed historical resources, or Cortese-list sites also disqualifies.

Scale. No hard acreage cap, but large footprints invite challenge — document why overall impact remains minor.

Most common basis for hand-crew fuel-reduction NOEs NOE: include RPF attestation (PRC §753) and address each §15300.2 exception
Categorical · §15300.2 applies

Other categorical exemptions Classes 1, 7, 8, 33

Worth knowing — narrower scope or specific agency triggers.
Class 1
§15301 Existing Facilities. Operation, repair, maintenance, minor alteration with negligible expansion. Useful for ongoing maintenance of previously cleared fuel breaks.
Class 7
§15307 Natural Resources. Regulatory agency actions to assure maintenance, restoration, enhancement of a natural resource.
Class 8
§15308 Environment. Regulatory agency actions to assure protection of the environment.
Class 33
§15333 Small Habitat Restoration. ≤5 acres for fish/plant/wildlife habitat. Per the 2021 Crowfoot memo, T&E species presence and mechanized equipment use do not per se preclude use. Categorical counterpart to SERP for small projects.
Closed to new apps · May 1, 2026

March 2025 Emergency Proclamation EO N-18-25 / EO N-38-25

Historic record only — approved projects remain valid.

What it did. Suspended CEQA, CESA, Coastal Act, and other state environmental laws for fuels projects ≤3,000 ac meeting one of six wildfire-risk-reduction objectives.

Status. >400 projects approved (≈80,000 ac). On-the-ground work must begin by Oct 15, 2026; completion within 2 years (extensions to 5 years for CAL FIRE Wildfire Prevention, Forest Health, and some Prop 4 grants).

Compliance. Statewide Fuels Reduction Environmental Protection Plan (Nov 2025) governs BMPs for all approved projects.

Replacement. No direct successor yet. The Wildfire & Forest Resilience Task Force 2026 Action Plan update is expected to recommend a long-term framework.

Special considerations & narrow-use exemptions

Oak woodland, declared emergency, planning studies Narrow-use exemptions & checks

Read these before signing off on the primary pathway.
Oak woodlands
Two distinct rules — don't confuse them.
CEQA side — PRC §21083.4. Not an exemption. Requires a public agency to determine whether a project may result in conversion of oak woodlands and apply specified mitigation if significant. Forestry/fuels projects that maintain the woodland (thinning encroaching conifers, removing ladder fuels) are generally not “conversion” and proceed under Class 4. Check the county Oak Resources Management Plan for “Fire Safe Activities” exemptions.
Forest Practice side — 14 CCR §1038(e). A true exemption from THP preparation requirements for commercial timber operations restoring oak woodland. See Card ⑧. Operates under the FPA's Certified Regulatory Program for CEQA purposes.
§15269(a)
Declared emergency. Work to prevent or mitigate damage from a sudden, unexpected occurrence. The 2015 statewide tree mortality proclamation remains active for high-hazard zones.
§15262
Feasibility / planning study. Useful for CWPP-style documents that don’t commit the agency to physical action.
§15061(b)(3)
“Common-sense” exemption. Available where it can be seen with certainty that a project has no possibility of significant effect.
Forest Practice · CAL FIRE

Forest Practice Act exemptions 14 CCR §1038

Functional CEQA equivalent for commercial timber projects.
§1038(c)
Structure Protection. Trees within 150 ft of an approved & legally permitted structure. No clearcut / seed tree / shelterwood removal.
§1038(b) / (d)
Dead, Dying, or Diseased / Drought Mortality. Up to 10% of volume per acre, or only trees affected by drought mortality (RPF stump-mark certification required).
§1038(e)
Oak Woodland Exemption. Cutting/removal of trees to restore and conserve California black oak (Quercus kelloggii) or Oregon white oak (Quercus garryana) woodlands and associated grasslands. ≤300 ac per ownership per planning watershed per 5-year period. Stand must have ≥35 ft²/ac of living oak basal area; post-harvest conifer stocking <25% of total; harvested conifers within 300 ft of a qualifying oak ≥4″ DBH. AB 2276 (Wood, 2024) revised the exemption — conifer diameter limit increased toward 30″ DBH (Board of Forestry rulemaking in progress).
§1038.3
Forest Resilience Exemption (formerly Forest Fire Prevention). Up to 300 ac in Moderate/High/Very High FHSZ. Renamed and extended to Jan 1, 2031 by AB 2276.

For non-exempt commercial work: THP (5-yr), NTMP (≤2,500 ac), or PTEIR.

The FPA program is a Certified Regulatory Program under PRC §21080.5 — THP/NTMP review is the functional equivalent of an EIR.

Board of Forestry regs An RPF (Registered Professional Forester) is required to prepare or oversee FPA documents and stump-mark exempt harvests — consult one early.
§ 03 · Working notes for Nevada County practitioners

Applying the pathways on the ground.

Practitioner notes from the Permitting & Environmental Compliance Subcommittee — how the pathways map to the kinds of projects QWSG participants are running across the county.

Federal land partnerships

For projects on BLM / USFS land with completed NEPA: lead with §4799.05(d) (SB 901 / AB 211).

Cleanest pathway through its Jan 1, 2028 sunset, including Good Neighbor Authority projects. Document the NEPA basis carefully and confirm any EIS-identified impacts are addressed in project design. The 2025 bill to remove the sunset (AB 404, Sanchez) failed, so plan around the 2028 expiration. The June 2026 draft Action Plan (3.9) anticipates federal partners expanding categorical exclusions and programmatic NEPA, which would widen this pathway's reach.

Restoration-primary

SERP is now the strongest tool for exclusively-restoration work.

No acreage cap, no §15300.2 exceptions. Requires CDFW Director concurrence (60-day target). Recent Sierra Nevada Conservancy grant amendments for fuels-reduction-with-restoration objectives have used SERP. For projects ≤5 acres, Class 33 is the lighter-weight categorical alternative.

Private / WUI

SB 131 §21080.49 is powerful for the urban interface, but geographically limited.

Particularly (c) home hardening / defensible space and (d) 200-ft fuel breaks — strong fits for projects adjacent to Grass Valley, Nevada City, Penn Valley, and other county subdivisions. The ≤50-ac + ½-mile-from-30-DU constraint on subdivision (a) prescribed fire will limit applicability for more remote sites in the county.

Oak woodland

Conifer encroachment removal generally proceeds under Class 4.

Ladder fuel reduction that maintains the woodland is generally not “conversion” under PRC §21083.4. Review Nevada County’s local oak ordinance treatment before filing — many counties expressly exempt fire-safe activities from local mitigation requirements.

Mid-sized landscape · 50–3,000 ac

If you can’t fit SB 131 or §4799.05(d): CalVTP PEIR.

Still the best fit for landscape projects in that band. Watch for the updated PEIR (expected late 2026 / 2027) — intended to expand the treatable landscape and streamline PSA preparation.

Commercial timber component

If the project includes a commercial sale: Forest Practice is the foundation.

THP, NTMP, PTEIR, or a 14 CCR §1038 exemption sits beneath the project. A CEQA exemption (e.g. SB 131 wildfire category) may layer on top depending on funding source and land status. For private-land oak woodland restoration projects in the watershed — removing encroaching conifers to recover the woodland — the §1038(e) Oak Woodland Exemption is purpose-built for that work, especially after the AB 2276 expansion. Engage an RPF early — a Registered Professional Forester is required to prepare or co-sign FPA documents and must stump-mark harvests under most §1038 exemptions. The June 2026 draft Action Plan (Key Action 3.8) directs the Board of Forestry to convene a workgroup to streamline THP review timelines and reduce redundancies with regional water board and CDFW review. Pending AB 442 (2026) would also raise NTMP caps to 4,000 ac and WFMP caps to 15,000 ac and drop the single-hydrologic-area limit on WFMP harvest areas — worth watching if a working-forest plan is your foundation.

Process · always

Document the exemption basis with a memo to file.

For statutory exemptions, file a Notice of Exemption with OPR or the county clerk to start the 35-day statute of limitations.

§ 04 · Resources & outbound links

Where to read the underlying authority.

Direct links to statutes, regulations, agency programs, and current policy documents cited above. Verify currency at the source before relying on any of these — statutes change.

Statutes — Public Resources Code

Bills — 2018–2026 sessions

  • SB 131 (Wiener)Wildfire risk reduction exemption
  • SB 901 (Dodd, 2018)Created §4799.05(d) NEPA-federal exemption
  • AB 211 (2022)Extended §4799.05(d) sunset to Jan 1, 2028
  • AB 404 (Sanchez, 2025)Would have removed §4799.05(d) sunset — failed in committee
  • SB 174Extends SERP to 2030
  • AB 2276 (Wood)Forest Practice exemption revisions
  • AB 1227 (Ellis)VHFHSZ fuels-reduction exemption to 2028 — held in Senate Appropriations (two-year bill)
  • AB 2102 (DeMaio)Fuel-reduction exemption, any acreage — in committee, not advanced (2026)
  • SB 375Fuel reduction across FHSZ tiers — failed (Joint Rule 56, Feb 2026)
  • AB 442Gut-amended 2026 → Forest Practice Act NTMP/WFMP acreage

Programmatic & agency

Emergency Proclamation

Filing