YWI-RFP-2026-02

Addenda & Q&A

All clarifications, scope changes, and answered questions for the Round Mountain 2026 Timber Operations RFP. Bidders are responsible for reviewing and acknowledging all addenda.

Addenda

Addenda & scope changes

When the scope or terms change, YWI issues a numbered addendum here. Where the change is extensive, the full RFP is republished with changes marked.

Posted September 9, 2026

Addendum 03 — Business license requirement corrected

What changed
  • Removes the requirement to provide proof of a “California business license”: California issues no general statewide business license, and businesses in unincorporated Nevada County cannot obtain a county one
  • Accepts instead any one of a city or county business license, California Secretary of State good standing, a filed Fictitious Business Name statement, or a signed statement that none is available
  • Removes business status documentation from the Section IV.A pass or fail list, so an otherwise responsive proposal is no longer rejected over it
  • Adds a three business day cure period, applied on the same terms to every proposer, where that documentation is missing or incomplete
  • Leaves the LTO-A certification, field meeting attendance, and proof of insurance as pass or fail conditions, unchanged

A proposer advised YWI that the California business license requirement could not be met because no such license exists. YWI confirmed this: business licensing in California is administered locally, and Nevada County does not issue business licenses for unincorporated areas. Because the requirement sat in the pass or fail list, a qualified operator could have been rejected for failing to produce a document that does not exist. This Addendum relaxes a requirement and adds no new work or cost. The schedule is unchanged and proposals remain due September 14, 2026. A proposer that has already submitted need not resubmit and may send the business status documentation as a supplement by the deadline. Proposers must acknowledge Addenda No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3 on the Cost Proposal Form at Exhibit F.

Posted September 1, 2026

Addendum 02 — Licensing requirement clarified

What changed
  • Confirms that a current and valid Licensed Timber Operator Class A (LTO-A) certification satisfies the licensing requirement for the timber operations described in Exhibit B
  • Removes the separate “contractor’s license” item from the licensing requirement at Section III.E.6 and from the pass or fail list at Section IV.A
  • States that, for purposes of this solicitation, a Contractors State License Board classification is not separately required
  • Leaves the Contract’s licensing and permitting obligations at Sections 2.10(b) and 2.11(e) unchanged

This Addendum responds to a question received after the August 26, 2026 question deadline. Because the licensing requirement is a pass or fail condition that bears on whether a proposal can be accepted at all, YWI is answering it by addendum so that every proposer receives the same information. The schedule is unchanged and proposals remain due September 14, 2026. Proposers must acknowledge Addenda No. 1 and No. 2 on the Cost Proposal Form at Exhibit F.

Posted August 31, 2026

Addendum 01 — Amendments to Exhibits B and C

Revised exhibits attached
What changed
  • Clarifies that the hardwood thinning rule includes maples
  • Defines what qualifies as brush for the 1-acre retention requirement: generally broad-leaved species, not primarily conifer regeneration
  • Sets the disposal rule for cut sub-merchantable material — over 1″ DBH cut and piled, under 1″ DBH crushed by equipment and left in place
  • Specifies what happens to fireline spoil — material over 1″ in diameter to a burn pile, duff and fines to the side of the line on the same ownership
  • Establishes the order of operations — cutting precedes fireline construction
  • Attaches revised copies of Exhibits B and C with the added text underlined

This Addendum responds to questions raised at the mandatory pre-proposal field meeting on August 24, 2026. No written questions were submitted by the August 26 deadline. The schedule is unchanged and proposals remain due September 14, 2026. Proposers must acknowledge this Addendum on the Cost Proposal Form at Exhibit F. At contract execution the exhibits attached to the executed contract will be conformed to incorporate these amendments.

underlined text = newly addedstruck-through text = removed
Questions & Answers

Answers to bidder questions

Questions submitted by prospective bidders are answered here for everyone. Newest first.

16 of 16 shown
Section III.E.6 requires proof of a California business license, but California does not issue a general statewide business license. What should a proposer provide instead?Posted September 9, 2026

That is correct, and the requirement has been withdrawn. California issues no general statewide business license. Business licensing in California is administered locally, and a business license or business tax certificate is issued, if at all, by the city or county in which a business operates. Nevada County does not require or issue business licenses for businesses in its unincorporated areas, so a proposer based in unincorporated territory may have no such document available to it.

In place of that requirement, provide evidence that the proposer is a legally constituted business by any one of the following, at the proposer’s option: a current business license or business tax certificate from the city or county of the proposer’s principal place of business; a certificate of status or current Statement of Information showing good standing with the California Secretary of State; a filed Fictitious Business Name statement; or, if none of those is available, a signed statement to that effect identifying the proposer’s jurisdiction.

This documentation is no longer a pass or fail item. Where a proposal is otherwise responsive but the documentation is missing or incomplete, YWI will notify the proposer and allow three business days to provide it, on the same terms for every proposer. The LTO-A certification, attendance at the August 24 field meeting, and proof of insurance remain pass or fail conditions. A proposer that has already submitted a proposal need not resubmit and may provide this documentation as a supplement by the September 14 deadline. See Addendum No. 3.

Do the Cost Proposal Form, insurance certificates, and licensing documents count toward the ten-page limit?Posted September 9, 2026

No. None of those count against the ten pages. Section III.D of the RFP provides:

“Proposals shall be a single 8½″ × 11″ PDF of no more than ten (10) pages. The following do not count toward the page limit: a one-page cover letter, the Cost Proposal Form, insurance certificates, licensing documents, and addendum acknowledgments.”

The ten-page limit therefore applies only to the narrative portions of the proposal: approach, staffing, work plan and schedule (Section III.E.2); experience, qualifications and references (Section III.E.3); and local workforce (Section III.E.4).

The Cost Proposal Form at Exhibit F, insurance certificates, licensing documents, a one-page cover letter, and addendum acknowledgments are all submitted in addition to those ten pages.

Does a Licensed Timber Operator Class A (LTO-A) certification satisfy the licensing requirement, or is a Contractors State License Board (CSLB) classification also required?Posted September 1, 2026

Proposers shall provide proof of a California business license and of a current and valid Licensed Timber Operator Class A (LTO-A) certification in good standing with the California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection. For purposes of this solicitation, a Contractors State License Board classification is not separately required, and the LTO-A certification satisfies the licensing requirement for the timber operations described in Exhibit B.

Nothing in the foregoing relieves the Contractor of its obligation under Section 2.11(e) of the Contract to secure all licenses and permits, and to file all notices, required by law in connection with its performance. Section 2.10(b) of the Contract is also unchanged: the Operator must hold a current and active LTO-A license in good standing, all required licenses and permits for commercial vehicle operations, and a county or state highway encroachment permit if one is needed.

The successful proposer must also be amended onto MTHP #2-23-00126-NEV before operations begin, as provided in Exhibit B, Section 1. See Addendum No. 2.

Are specific locations designated for burn pile construction, and is there a preference for where piles go?Posted August 31, 2026

No locations are pre-designated, and none are shown on the Project Map at Exhibit A. YWI's preference is to place piles at either of the two landings where capacity allows. The landings are not expected to hold all of the material, so some piles in the woods away from the landings will be necessary.

Pile siting is governed by the placement rules in Exhibit B, Section 2.3: at least 25 feet from the dripline of residual trees, at least 100 feet from property lines and from the edge of any adjacent untreated fuels, at least 200 feet from homes or structures, and at least 100 feet from retained brush patches. Piles must sit in open areas where burning under prescribed conditions would not be likely to scorch or kill residual trees. The RPF may approve a lesser distance from property lines and adjacent untreated fuels in writing.

In-woods piles are subject to the 60-foot maximum diameter in Exhibit B, Section 2.3; piles at a landing are not subject to that limit. Where no natural opening exists, additional trees may be cut to create one, but each such tree must be approved and marked by the RPF before cutting.

Is mastication of small-diameter trees and brush allowed under this contract?Posted August 31, 2026

No. Mastication is not an approved treatment method under this contract. Sub-merchantable material designated for removal is handled one of two ways, by diameter: material over 1 inch DBH is cut and placed in burn piles, and material under 1 inch DBH is crushed by equipment and left in place, to be consumed in the later broadcast burn.

Crushing is not mastication. The material is crushed by equipment and left where it lies; it is not ground, chipped, or masticated. See Addendum No. 1, Item 3.

Is all small-diameter material to be cut, or is there a lower diameter cut-off or a species retention requirement?Posted August 31, 2026

All designated sub-merchantable material must be treated, but not all of it is cut. There is a lower cut-off for cutting at 1 inch DBH. Material under 1 inch DBH is crushed by equipment and left in place rather than cut; material 1 inch DBH and over is cut and placed in burn piles.

Which trees are designated for removal is set by the prescription at Exhibit C, Section 3, which is a designation by prescription rather than a diameter rule: remove small-diameter trees (under 10 inches DBH) and brush from within the dripline of vigorous, healthy dominant, codominant and intermediate trees, and where no dominant or codominant overstory is present, thin the intermediate size class to an average of 15 feet stem to stem, non-uniformly, in clumps of two to four trees with interspersed gaps.

Retention requirements do apply. Within the sub-merchantable class, sugar pine, Douglas-fir, dogwood and any riparian hardwood species shall not be cut at any size. Oaks and sprouting hardwoods are thinned only where they act as a ladder fuel to overstory trees, and this includes maples. Untreated brush patches totaling roughly 1 acre must be retained — see the question below on what qualifies as brush. Dead trees under 10 inches DBH are removed, while snags 10 inches DBH and larger are retained under Exhibit B, Section 2.4. The retention priorities at Exhibit C, Section 4 are conservation easement compliance obligations, not preferences.

Must the operator construct fireline around each burn pile, and do the piles need to be covered?Posted August 31, 2026

No fireline is required around individual piles. The separation distances in Exhibit B, Section 2.3 serve that purpose, together with the perimeter fireline along the southern and eastern boundaries required by Section 2.5.

Piles are not covered in full. Each pile requires an ignition area of not less than 5 feet by 5 feet covered with waxed paper laid over finer fuels such as small branches, so the pile lights readily. The Contractor furnishes the waxed paper. Nothing in this contract requires polyethylene sheeting or full pile covering.

Is someone else doing the burning?Posted August 31, 2026

Yes. All burning falls outside this scope and will be carried out under a separate contract that YWI procures. There are two burning operations, in sequence: the piles built under this contract are burned first, as their own operation, and the broadcast burn follows afterward. The Contractor's obligation is to build piles that meet the construction and placement standards in Exhibit B, Section 2.3 so the burn contractor can light them under prescription.

Is there already a purchase order for the timber, and who pays the yield tax?Posted August 31, 2026

Yes. Sierra Pacific Industries Purchase Log Confirmation PO-18-2026006, Sale Name ROUND MTN '26, Sale No. 18-1657, is reproduced in full at Exhibit D. Yuba Watershed Institute is the Seller of record. The effective date is August 1, 2026 and the stated expiration is November 15, 2026. YWI expects SPI to extend it for the duration of operations, and the mill-interruption provisions at Exhibit B, Section 2.2 and Sections 2.08 and 2.19 of the Contract apply if it lapses.

YWI is the Timber Owner of record under Minor Deviation #2 to MTHP #2-23-00126-NEV, accepted by CAL FIRE on August 6, 2026. YWI pays the California timber yield tax and the forest excise tax. Title to timber and logs never passes to the Contractor. Proposed unit prices are therefore service rates and must include no offset or credit for timber value.

Is all the work mechanical, or is hand work required anywhere?Posted August 31, 2026

The work is mechanical. The only hand work this contract contemplates is fireline. Exhibit B, Section 2.5 provides that fireline is machine constructed except where the RPF directs hand construction because of site conditions. Hand-constructed fireline so directed is paid at the additive unit rate, Item 4 on the Cost Proposal Form at Exhibit F. That additive rate sits outside the scored total, so proposers should price it realistically.

May prospective bidders arrange with the landowner to revisit the site while preparing a bid?Posted August 31, 2026

No. The mandatory pre-proposal field meeting on August 24, 2026 was the site visit. The property is private and gated, and RFP Section I directs proposers not to contact the RPF or the landowner directly regarding this solicitation.

What should be done with material scraped from the fireline?Posted August 31, 2026

Material larger than 1 inch in diameter shall be removed to a burn pile. All other material — scraped duff, small sticks and similar fine material — shall be placed to the side of the fireline, preferably outside the timber unit, and in all cases on the same ownership.

Sequence matters: cut the trees and brush first, then construct the fireline. Some trees may need to be removed before the line can be put in. See Addendum No. 1, Item 4.

What is the desired fireline width, one blade or two?Posted August 31, 2026

One blade width, constructed to bare mineral soil using the minimum disturbance necessary, not excavated deeper than required to expose mineral soil, and properly waterbarred per the MTHP, with bladed material pushed to the outside of the fire unit. Where the RPF directs hand line instead, it is 3 feet wide and likewise waterbarred.

For the brush retention requirement, what qualifies as brush?Posted August 31, 2026

Retained brush patches shall generally be comprised of broad-leaved brush species, and shall not be comprised primarily of conifer regeneration. The remaining requirements of the brush retention bullet at Exhibit C, Section 3 are unchanged: roughly 1 acre total, about 2 to 3 percent of the unit, in patches of one quarter to one half acre, favoring dense, tall shrub cover, located outside leave-tree driplines and at least 100 feet from planned pile locations, with patch locations chosen by the Contractor subject to RPF approval or flagged by the RPF beforehand. See Addendum No. 1, Item 2.

Can the smallest cedars be crushed rather than cut and carried to a pile?Posted August 31, 2026

Yes, below 1 inch DBH. All sub-merchantable trees to be removed that are over 1 inch DBH shall be cut and piled. All sub-merchantable trees to be removed that are under 1 inch DBH shall be crushed by equipment and left in place. See Addendum No. 1, Item 3.

Is pruning of lower branches on residual trees required?Posted August 31, 2026

No. Neither the Scope of Work nor the DxP Guidelines requires pruning of residual trees, and proposers should not price it.

The question period has closed

All answers are posted above. Addenda issued for this RFP are listed at the top of this page, and proposers are responsible for acknowledging each one.

Support our work

Your donation sustains forest health and watershed stewardship for future generations.

Donate Now